The JOOLA Ben Johns Perseus Pro V 16mm is a refinement of the popular Pro IV, not a revolution. For most players, the Pro IV at $250 is the smarter buy.
The Verdict
A more polished Perseus — at a price.
More planted, more predictable. Less raw pop than the Pro IV. After thorough on-court evaluation, the JOOLA Perseus Pro V landed in the upper tier of the paddles we tested in 2026.
If you're comparing it against other foam-core paddles, it's one of several great foam core paddles we've played this year.
Specs
| Overall Score | 8.7 / 10 |
| Price (with code) | $299.99 |
| Stock Price | $299.99 |
| Shape | Elongated |
| Thickness | 16mm |
| Core | Propulsion Core + KineticFrame™ |
| Face | Carbon Friction Surface |
| Weight | 8.1 oz |
| Grip Length | 5.5" |
| Swing Weight | 118 |
Performance Scores
On-Court Feel
The KineticFrame technology stores momentum in the throat and releases it on impact. In practice this makes the Pro V feel more planted and predictable than the Pro IV. Drives still have serious authority but the response is smoother. The trade-off is that the instant pop that made the Pro IV feel electric is slightly dampened.
Performance & Testing
The JOOLA Perseus Pro V went through our standard on-court protocol - drills, rec play, and at least one tournament match. Scores reflect consensus feedback, not a single reviewer's opinion.
Grit & Durability
Same Carbon Friction Surface as the Pro IV. The 12-month plus 3-replacement warranty is a meaningful improvement. JOOLA's core durability track record is still worth monitoring.
Who It's For
Players who already love the Perseus shape and want a more consistent, controlled version.
Pros & Cons
Pros
- More predictable than the Pro IV
- Better soft-game control
- 12 months + 3 replacements warranty
- Dual certified (USAP + UPA-A)
Cons
- $50 more than Pro IV for a marginal upgrade
- Less instant pop than Pro IV
- JOOLA durability history worth monitoring
Bottom Line
A small upgrade at a big price.
The Pro V is good, but the Pro IV at $250 is the smarter buy for most players.
Compare to
